Legal Opinion

Mid-States Insurance v. Claxton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1953No. 34644PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. Where an insurer agrees in an automobile casualty-insurance policy to pay any loss covered by the policy to two persons, a finance company and the purchaser of the automobile, as their interests may appear, the purchaser may maintain an action to recover for a loss covered by the terms of the policy. Johnson v. General Exchange Ins. Corp., 49 Ga. App. 780 (176 S. E. 840); Riley v. Federal Ins. Co., 60 Ga. App. 764 (5 S. E. 2d 246).

2. The question as to whether the finance company, to which is still owed a portion of the purchase price of the stolen automobile, is a necessary party to an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Richter v. RichterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Riley v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Federal Land Bank v. ForresterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. New Jersey Insurance v. RowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY v. PincusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API