Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Hambly Fruit Products Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. — T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

One who shows himself to he the innocent holder of a note negotiable in form may recover thereon, not-ivithstanding the fact that the note was executed in *143this State to a payee that was a foreign corporation, which had not, though required to do so, complied with the laws of this State in respect of the filing here of a copy of its charter of incorporation.

Whatever may be the rule as to the maintenance of suit by such corporate payee itself (Orr’s Administrator v. Orr, 157 Ky., 570, 163 S. W., 757), or whatever. may have been the rule as to the right of an innocent holder in that regard…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halsey v. Henry Jewett Dramatic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. PickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Orr's Administrator v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Young v. GausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Price v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Conrad v. RareyOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Frazier v. LaffertyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Allison Hill Trust Co. v. SarandreaNew York Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API