Legal Opinion

Liriano v. Hobart Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 12, 1995No. 94 Civ. 5279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Luis Liriano (“Liriano”) sues defendant Hobart Corporation (“Hobart”) for injuries sustained while using a meat cutter manufactured by Hobart. Plaintiff now moves, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 39(b), for leave to demand a jury trial. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Liriano commenced this personal injury action against Hobart on March 29, 1994, in New York Supreme Court, Bronx County. Pursuant to this Court’s diversity jurisdiction, Hobart removed the case to this Court on July 19,1994. At the time of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Higgins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Lisette Cascone v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Landau v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Unger v. Cunard Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. Amtrak Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API