Legal Opinion

State v. Luster

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 15, 1935No. 14173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice StabeEr.

The defendants, Luster and Hill, were convicted of the murder of E. D. Milam, and were sentenced to die by electrocution. They have both appealed to this Court from the verdict and judgment, and from the refusal of the trial Judge to grant their motion for a new trial.

The evidence for the State, as it appears in the record for appeal, tended to establish the following facts: At the time of his death, Milam was a member of the State Highway Patrol and was wearing the usual uniform, badge, and other insignia of a patrolman. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Wyndham v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Yongue v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API