Legal Opinion

Canning v. Canning

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1951No. 2851PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Elizabeth Canning sued her husband, Harold Canning, for divorce and custody of their children, a girl, two, and a 'boy, six years of age. Harold Canning filed a cross-action for divorce and custody of the children. On a trial to the court, judgment was rendered,granting Mrs. Canning a divorce. Custody of the children was awarded the mother for six months and .to the father ■for six months of each year. Mrs. Canning has appealed.

Appellant predicates her appeal upon one point, to-wit: “The trial court erred' in failing to award full custody of the children to appellant.” It will serve no useful…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Swift v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Watts v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Lasater v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Hamer v. HamerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beasley v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Rousseau v. RousseauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Ott v. OttCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Hall v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Classic v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API