Legal Opinion

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1976No. 75-1732PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the factual circumstances reflect that the state failed to accord defendant a speedy trial thereby entitling him to a discharge as a matter of right. See Rule 3.191(a)(1). Fla.R.Crim.P, More than 180 days had elapsed since defendant was taken into custody as a result of the conduct of the criminal episode giving rise to the crime charged. Boatman v. State, 306 So.2d 592 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Benton v. State, 307 So.2d 198 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). See also State v. Benton, Fla.Sup.Ct., 337 So.2d 797, opinion filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rubiera v. Dade County Ex Rel. BenitezSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. State v. BentonSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Boatman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Benton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Muller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Ballard v. KaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. In Re Estate of RadonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Llanusa v. GlicksteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API