Legal Opinion
Amick v. Horton
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1985No. 13582PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROW, Presiding Judge.
Ruby Lee Amick (“plaintiff”) appeals from an order dismissing her cause of action with prejudice. The order was entered because plaintiff failed to answer interrogatories served on her by the two defendants: her son, Dale E. Amick, and her son-in-law, Eugene Horton.
The suit began February 16, 1982, when Columbia Mutual Insurance Company, formerly Midland Mutual Insurance Company (“the insurer”), filed a petition against the two defendants, alleging that on September 28, 1981, a dwelling owned by plaintiff and insured by the insurer against loss by fire was “wholly and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co. v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Whitenton v. WhitentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Crompton v. Curtis-Toledo, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Portell v. PortellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Jones v. ReaganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Luster v. GastineauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Smithey v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Koonce v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- McManemin v. McMillinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Richardson v. LombardiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990