Legal Opinion
HUNTSVILLE AVIATION CORPORATION v. Ford
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 29, 1991No. 89-898PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Huntsville Aviation Corporation appeals from a summary judgment against it on its claims against two defendants, Thomas S. Ford and Madison Investment Company, Inc., for damages based on an alleged breach of a lease or for the value of the defendants' use and occupation of its premises. Its claims against a third defendant, Aviation Services, Inc., remained pending when this appeal was taken.1 Ford is the majority stockholder of Madison Investment and the sole stockholder of Aviation Services. The principal question is whether Huntsville Aviation should be held to have dealt solely with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cohen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Forest Hill Corp. v. Latter & Blum, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & A. ASS'N OF OMAHA v. BullardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Sheetz, Aiken & Aiken, Inc. v. SPANN ETC., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Woods v. Commercial Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- South Alabama Pigs, LLC v. Farmer Feeders, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- Dill v. Rembrandt Group, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Armstrong v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
- In Re Coala, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- Aureus International, Inc. v. Coala, Inc. (In re Coala, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.