Costanza v. Costanza

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: *1044Supreme Court did not err in finding defendant in civil contempt of court based upon his violation of this Court’s order regarding his visitation rights (Costanza v Costanza, 199 AD2d 988; see, Cannizzaro v Cannizzaro, 186 AD2d 776, 778; Bergin v Peplowski, 173 AD2d 1012, 1013; Richards v Estate of Kaskel, 169 AD2d 111, 121, Iv dismissed 78 NY2d 1042). A hearing is not required unless there is a factual issue in…