Legal Opinion

Villines v. Tomerlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1962No. Civ. 96PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages against the Motel Fresno, a copartnership, and David W. Tomerlin in which he charged that Tomerlin assaulted him on the Motel Fresno premises, and for negligence. Issue was joined and as an affirmative defense, defendants asserted self-defense and defense of property. At the commencement of trial the two causes of action sounding in negligence were dismissed and plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages was abandoned. The cause was tried by a jury on plaintiff’s theory of assault and battery and defendants’ theory of defense of self and property, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. SoulesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Perry v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartosh v. BanningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Mazzilli v. DoudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Saba v. DarlingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Madeline Curry, Etc. v. Fred Olsen Line, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. In re Pedro B. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API