Roberts v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
SIMMS, Vice Chief Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent. I believe the statute is viola-tive of due process and equal protection guarantees of the state and federal constitutions, and the majority opinion has not persuaded me otherwise.
Donna Roberts has a valid, final and otherwise enforceable judgment for support alimony. The State of Oklahoma, through enactment of § 1289(D), has declared her rights in that judgment “lost” due to her sexual conduct and living arrangement. That conduct was lawful and occurred in the privacy of her home, in a living arrangement which was also lawful.
We are not…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.