Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roberts v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1983No. 55069Published

1Dissent

SIMMS, Vice Chief Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent. I believe the statute is viola-tive of due process and equal protection guarantees of the state and federal constitutions, and the majority opinion has not persuaded me otherwise.

Donna Roberts has a valid, final and otherwise enforceable judgment for support alimony. The State of Oklahoma, through enactment of § 1289(D), has declared her rights in that judgment “lost” due to her sexual conduct and living arrangement. That conduct was lawful and occurred in the privacy of her home, in a living arrangement which was also lawful.

We are not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API