Florida Land Holding Corp. v. Lee
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Section 1026 C. G. L., 795 R. G. S., provides that when an owner recovers land upon which a tax deed has issued he must refund taxes paid and interest, and pay for any expenses and improvements. The statute in question was enacted in its present form in 1927 and has received judicial consideration since that time in the following cases: San Sebastian Dev. Co. v. Couch, 103 Fla. 692, 138 Sou. Rep. 61; Lovett v. Shore, 111 Fla. 592, 139 Sou. Rep. 194; Hecht v. Cardinal, 103 Fla. 930, 140 Sou. Rep. 648; Kane v. Eustis, 106 Fla. 817, 143 Sou. 655; Lovett v. Shore, 111 Fla. 592, 149 Sou. Rep. 603.
T…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kane v. Eustis Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- San Sebastian Development Corp. v. CouchSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Lovett v. ShoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Hecht v. CardinalSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hughes, Et Vir v. ShanerSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Rives v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Saussy v. Northern Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- CDC Builders, Inc. v. Biltmore-Sevilla Debt Investors, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Paragon Mortgage Holdings, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012