Pollard v. Crowghost
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant Faye Michelle Crowghost challenges the district court’s order granting permanent legal and physical custody of her child, M.R.P.-C., to respondents Kathryn Michelle Pollard and Marvin Warze-cha, the child’s paternal grandparents. Because the district court failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing and to make adequate findings on the issue of whether respondents satisfy the statutory requirements of de facto custodians and because the district court did not inquire into whether ICWA applied to M.R.P.-C.’s custody proceedings, we conclude that the district…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In the Interest of J.J.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- In re J.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Trever I.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel GoemaatCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.N.T. and J.W., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Michelle M. v. Dcs, H.N.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017