Legal Opinion

State v. Fleming

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 22, 2007No. 24478-4-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Michael B. Fleming appeals his voyeurism conviction. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We affirm.

Kato, J.* —

¶2 On the night of April 5, 2005, Mr. Fleming and his ex-girlfriend, Tammy, went out drinking. They ended up at Cyrus O’Leary’s Restaurant in downtown Spokane, Washington. Because Mr. Fleming appeared intoxicated, the bartender refused to serve him. The couple was, however, allowed to order some appetizers.

¶3 After they had eaten, Tammy stood up and headed to the rest room. Mr. Fleming left a few minutes later. The bartender saw him outside the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Benjamin Eric StutzkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. State Of Washington, V. Abdulrizak Isaac YusufCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API