Legal Opinion

State v. Tate

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2013No. 98221PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Tate,

2013-Ohio-370.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98221 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ALPHONSO TATE DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-544177 BEFORE: E.A. Gallagher, J., Keough, P.J., and McCormack, J. RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: February 7, 2013 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Edward M. Heindel 450 Standard Building 1370 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ZolikoffOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  3. State v. BoydOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. State v. DixOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API