Legal Opinion

Fighiera v. Radis

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1919No. L. A. No. 4912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The record on appeal consists of the judgment-roll alone.

On October 26, 1914, plaintiff owned a certain promissory note executed by one Woodford, to Ray Zug, for thirty thousand dollars, due January 29, 1917, and secured by a trust deed executed to the Title Guarantee & Trust Company for certain parcels of land. The land was subject to a prior mortgage for twenty-nine thousand dollars. On October 26, 1914, plaintiffs borrowed money from the defendant, in consideration of which they executed to defendant their promissory note for seven thousand dollars,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Felton v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fogarty v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Cormerais v. GenellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Godfrey v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Jenkins v. JenkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Coley v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Carpenter v. FroloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API