Legal Opinion

Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Mattocks

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 13, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 388PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

Is the Elks Hospital a “hospital” as defined in an insurance policy issued by the appellant? This is the sole question presented by this appeal.

Edyth Mattocks, a widow, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, instituted against Reserve Life Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant, an action for damages for alleged breach of contract by the defendant. The contract was a Hospital Surgical Expense Insurance Policy which provided certain coverage to the plaintiff and her deceased husband. The husband, prior to his death, was confined to the Arizona State Elks…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McKinney v. American Security Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Reserve Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Donald E. Marr, as of the Estate of Mary I. Marr, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Travelers Insurance Company v. EspositoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Patterson v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zuckerberg v. CrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Raynor v. American Heritage Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Taylor v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Burk v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Beaugureau v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API