Legal Opinion

Conos v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 2, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a bill in equity to compel specific performance of a covenant for renewal in a lease of certain premises. The lease, dated August 18, 1919, was for the term of five years .from date; and was given by Daniel R. Sullivan, who was then the owner of the premises but died before the bill was brought. The defendants are his sole heirs at law. The covenant for renewal is as follows: “ It is also agreed that the lessee may renew this lease for a further term of five years at a rent proportional to the increased valuation of the property, if any, provided the lessee notifies the lessor in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adams v. MessingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Fogg v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Pray v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Grace v. DenisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Emerson v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bendalin v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Caggiano v. MarchegianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. R. F. Robinson Co. v. DrewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  5. Garsson v. American Diesel Engine Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API