Legal Opinion
In re Interest of Chloe C.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided May 21, 2013No. A-12-921, A-12-922PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals IN RE INTEREST OF CHLOE C. 787 Cite as
20 Neb. App. 787
the statute is vague when applied to the conduct of others. Rung, supra. As stated above, we find that § 16-21 requires the operator of a motor vehicle registered in this state to produce an insurance policy, proof of a policy, or proof of financial responsibility to requesting law enforcement officers. Meints failed to produce the required proof, and therefore, he lacks standing to assert that § 16-21 is void for vagueness. V. CONCLUSION Finding that the evidence supports Meints’ conviction and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Interest of Aaron D.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re DeWayne G., Jr.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Sir Messiah T.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Wendy A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Interest of Kenna S.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Interest of Becka P.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. Tiffany S. (In Re Interest of Aly T.)Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Nebrasks (In Re Interest Audrey T.)Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re Interest of Audrey T.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re Interest of Damien S.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2013