Legal Opinion

Pell v. Pell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by James P. Robertson, the purchaser at a sale in partition, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 22d day of July, 1901, directing him to complete his purchase of the premises Ho. 488 Eighth avenue in the city of Hew York, pursuant to his bid at a sale thereof under a judgment in partition.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The appellant refused to complete his purchase by paying the balance of the purchase price and accepting the referee’s deed on account of certain alleged defects in the title to a part of the premises which was formerly part of the easterly half of the old Greenwich or Fitzroy road. The entire premises thus purchased by appellant have a frontage of twenty-four and nine-tenths feet on the westerly side of Eighth avenue and extend the same width in depth westerly one hundred feet, the southerly line being twenty-four and nine-tenths feet northerly of the northerly line of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. In re JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Deering v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Deering v. RileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Ruess v. EwenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koepp v. HollandDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  2. Potter v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API