Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Richardson v. Spruance

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Petition for mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The petitioner, as “president of the Colorado State Society and Bureau of Horticulture,” seeks to compel the respondent, as state auditor, to draw a warrant upon the state treasurer for the sum of $1,000, for the use of said Horticultural Society. The authority upon which the petitioner predicates the duty of the auditor to act in the premises is based upon the act of March 8, 1883 (Sess. Laws 1883, p. 210), entitled “ An act to promote and encourage horticulture and forestry in the state of Colorado, and to establish a bureau of horticulture.”

The first section of the act declares “ That the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. In re Continuing AppropriationsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Birdzell v. JorgensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Institute for the Education of the Mute & Blind v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API