Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Bruckman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Terrence F. Ferguson, from an order of the Supreme Oourt, made at the Kings County -Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 8th day of March, 1897, appointing a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtGoodrich, P. J.

The plaintiff and the defendant Julius Bruclcman were copartners in the plumbing business under the firm name of T. F. Ferguson & Coq which dissolved by mutual consent in May, 1896, at which time all the assets, excepting uncollected accounts and a piece of real estate, were divided between the partners. By this agreement it was provided that one Wright should collect the outstanding accounts, and the division of the collections should be made between the parties according to their respective rights as they should appear on a final settlement. Either before or pending the present action,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heath v. New York Building Loan Banking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Ferguson v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API