State v. Allen
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN:
Defendant, charged by information, with a felony — obtaining personal property by means of artifice or pretense, commonly called confidence game or bunco — was upon trial convicted by a jury. From the judgment of conviction defendant appeals.
The information charges that defendant “did commit the crime of obtaining money by artifice or pretense, in this, to-wit: That said defendant * * * did obtain from one Elsie Dibble certain personal property, to-wit: a diamond ring of a value in excess of fifty dollars * * * by means of artifice or pretense, commonly called confidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- State v. GaimosMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. SauterMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- Maxwell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- E. H. Tate Co. v. Jiffy Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- State v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1954