Legal Opinion
The U. S. 219
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 1937No. 11PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, District Judge.
This is a possessory suit in admiralty by which the libelant, Chesapeake Oil Transport Company, hereinafter called Chesapeake, seeks to secure the return to it by the respondents of oil barge U. S. 219, hereinafter called the barge. Respondent Steel Oil Transport Corporation, hereinafter called Steel, has filed a cross-libel against Chesapeake seeking damages for its loss of use of the barge during the time it has remained in the custody of the marshal since the institution of the suit. From the evidence I make the following
Special Findings of Fact.
On and prior to April…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- Luckenbach v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- The U. S. 219District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
- Nellie T.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Louis Shipbuilding & Steel Company v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Vicksburg, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- JJ Water Works, Inc. v. San Juan Towing & Marine Services, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Confederation of Switzerland v. Compania De Vapores Arauco Panamena, S. A.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941