Legal Opinion

Beattie v. American Trading & Production Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 8, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, Chief Judge.

This suit comes to us for decision on the agreed statement of facts set forth in the footnote.*

Plaintiffs, merchant seamen, seek a month’s penalty wages, under section *5974527 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, 46 U.S.C.A. §.594, which provides:

“§ 594. Right to wages in case of improper discharge. Any seaman who has signed an agreement and is afterward discharged before the commencement of the voyage or before one month’s wages are earned, without fault on his part justifying such discharge, and without his consent, shall be entitled to receive from the master or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Steel TraderSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Johnson v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  3. Lucadou v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph A. Zarraga, in No. 13226, Martin D. Ladd, in No. 13,227, George Martin, in No. 13,228 v. Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Zarrago v. Texas Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API