Legal Opinion

Philips v. Slocomb

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 23, 1933No. 258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

In the present case, it is more convenient to consider the latter question first.

This is an action brought by the receiver of an insolvent company to recover from a subscriber the amount due on a promissory note which had been given to the company by the subscriber in connection with her subscription agreement. The suit is simply on the note, but the pleas of the defendant set up that the sole consideration of the note was the subscription for the stock which it was agreed should be delivered when the final note was paid. These facts are admitted…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Sohland v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1927
  3. John W. Cooney Co. v. Arlington Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918
  4. Swearingen v. Sewickley Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Lex v. Selway Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  2. Carpenter v. Griffith Mortgage Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  3. David Myers v. Academy Securities, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
  4. Rock v. Antoine's, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API