Legal Opinion

Hartmann v. Hartmann

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon-. Joseph Gillespie, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

Appellants filed their bill for partition. Appellee answered, and joined in the prayer for relief.

Appellants are minors, who sue by their guardian. They inherited the lands from their mother; and appellee is their father, and tenant by the curtesy.

The circuit court refused the relief prayed for.

From the report of the master, we find that the lands are valuable, are underlaid by coal, are worth three dollars per acre for cultivation, and that, though less productive, they constitute a safer investment than money loaned.

It is assumed that the right of partition of lands, and the consequent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonner v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Grattan v. GrattanIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Shortall v. HinckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. King v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cooney v. CooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Alford v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ames v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Drake v. MerkleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Mechling v. MeyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API