Hartmann v. Hartmann
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon-. Joseph Gillespie, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton
Appellants filed their bill for partition. Appellee answered, and joined in the prayer for relief.
Appellants are minors, who sue by their guardian. They inherited the lands from their mother; and appellee is their father, and tenant by the curtesy.
The circuit court refused the relief prayed for.
From the report of the master, we find that the lands are valuable, are underlaid by coal, are worth three dollars per acre for cultivation, and that, though less productive, they constitute a safer investment than money loaned.
It is assumed that the right of partition of lands, and the consequent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bonner v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Grattan v. GrattanIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
- Shortall v. HinckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- King v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cooney v. CooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Alford v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Ames v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Drake v. MerkleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Mechling v. MeyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.