Legal Opinion

Woollen v. Ulrich

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

William W. Woollen, Jr., as the holder, sued John H. Ulrich and Daniel Ulrich as makers, and James B. Drake as endorser, of a promissory note as follows:

“ 1400.00. February 5th, 1872.
“ Six months after date (or before if made out of the sale of J. B. Drake’s Horse Hay-Fork and Hay-Carrier), wpromise to pay James B. Drake or order four hundred dollars, payable at the First National Bank at Indianapolis, value received, with use, without any relief from valuation or appraisement laws. If suit shall he instituted to enforce the payment hereof, we agree to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee.
*121“Witness:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nebeker v. CutsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cornell v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Steele v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Cronkhite v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Marshall v. DrescherIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Thomas v. RuddellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Baldwin v. BarrowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API