Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1936No. 6679PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge GERMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This suit involves the right of plaintiff in error, J. B. Blankenship (herein called plaintiff), to recover compensation, insurance from the Royal Indemnity Company, herein called defendant. The most important question is whether or not Blankenship, at the time of his injury, was an employee of Crain Ready-Cut House Company, whose compensation insurance was carried by defendant, or was an independent contractor. In the trial court a jury found that plaintiff was an employee and not an independent contractor. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Franklin Coal & Coke Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Poor v. Madison River Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Smith v. Marshall Ice Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Porter v. Withers Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Newspapers, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Anchor Casualty Company v. HartsfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Standard Insurance v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Texas Co. v. FreerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API