Legal Opinion · Dissent

St. Vladimir's Ukrainian Orthodox Church v. Fun Bun, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1971No. Appeal No. 147 C. D. 1971Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr. :

I dissent. I would hold that by rezoning the subject premises from R-4 to C-2 this particular lot is the object of special treatment. This unjustified1 reclassification is invalid spot zoning.

In Schubach v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 440 Pa. 249, 253, 270 A. 2d 397, 399 (1970), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said: “. . . Thus, singling out of one lot or a small area for different treatment from that accorded to similar surrounding land indistinguishable from it in character, for the economic benefit of the owner of that lot or to his economic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Mulac AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. SCHUBACH Et Ux. v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Arena v. Norristown Borough Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API