Central Finance Co. of Peru, Inc. v. Garber
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Royse, J.
I do not agree with the majority opinion on rehearing in this case. I believe our original opinion by- a unanimous court was based on sound principles of law and logic which have bec.ome firmly established *36in this State. LaPorte Discount Corporation v. Bessinger (1930), 91 Ind. App. 635, 171 N. E. 323; Guaranty Discount Corporation v. Bowers (1932), 94 Ind. App. 373, 158 N. E. 231 (Transfer denied) ; Nichols v. Bogda Motors, Inc. (1948), 118 Ind. App. 156, 77 N. E. 2d 905. It seems to me the majority opinion herein wholly ignores the rule of stare decisis.
As pointed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nichols v. Bogda Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Central Finance Co. of Peru, Inc. v. GarberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Guaranty Discount Corp. v. BowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Community State Bank v. CrissingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Laporte Discount Corp. v. BessingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930