Legal Opinion

In Re Hupton

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided November 25, 2002No. 18-01734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION AND MOTION FOR TURNOVER

PAUL J. KILBURG, Chief Judge.

The above-captioned matter was heard on October 8, 2002 on Trustee’s Objection to Exemption and Motion for Turnover. Trustee Sheryl Youngblut was represented by attorney Wes Huisinga. Debtors Robin and Susan Hupton were represented by attorney Jan McCool. After hearing arguments of counsel, the Court took the matter under advisement. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B, E).

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Trustee objects to Debtor’s exemption of her interest in an annuity contract and seeks…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In Re Charles W. Graham, Debtor. Edward F. Samore, Trustee v. Charles W. Graham, Trustee of the Charles W. Graham, M.D. Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. David Peters, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. General Service Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Whetzal v. AldersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. DeWit v. Firstar Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Heister (Heister)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  2. In Re SeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API