Legal Opinion
Frisella v. Transoceanic Cable Ship Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided January 11, 2002No. CIV.A.01-1855PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant TCSC’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED.
Background
Transoceanic Cable Ship Company is a New York corporation with its principal place of business in Maryland; it operates and manages a fleet of ships that lay underwater cable. Between 1997 and 2001, TCSC hired crew members through the Manpower Coordinator of the Seafarer’s International Union under the terms of a “Cable Ship Agreement” between it and the SIU. This agreement established the SIU as TCSC’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wyatt v. Walt Disney World, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Havey v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts, PLLC v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Potts v. Cameron Offshore Boats, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- In Re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liab.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.