Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bishop v. St John Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1984No. Docket 73857Published

1DissentBronson, P.J.

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s opinion. Plaintiffs requested an instruction on ordinary negligence which, it appears to me, was applicable under the facts presented at trial. Fogel v Sinai Hospital of Detroit, 2 Mich App 99; 138 NW2d 503 (1965); Gold v Sinai Hospital of Detroit, 5 Mich App 368; 146 NW2d 723 (1966). Although plaintiffs initially proceeded under a malpractice theory, GCR 1963, 118.3 permits the amendment of pleadings to conform to evidence adduced at trial provided that the amendment would not prejudice the opposing party. See, Denno v Providence Hospital, 19 Mich App…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fogel v. Sinai Hospital of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Gold v. Sinai Hospital of Detroit, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Denno v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API