Legal Opinion

Sollid v. Pennington County Housing Authority

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1981No. 13220Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order dismissing, with prejudice, appellant Joseph Sol-lid’s garnishment action. We affirm.

Appellant owns rental property. Because subsidized housing programs have allegedly damaged his rental business, appellant sought to recover lost rent, advertising costs, and utility charges from appellee, Pennington County Housing Authority. Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a garnishment action naming appellee as principal defendant and as garnishee. Appellee moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Appellant moved to amend his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunham v. First National Bank in Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Akron Savings Bank v. CharlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Ambrose v. Harrison Mutual Insurance AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Bettelyoun v. SandersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hullinger v. PrahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API