Legal Opinion

Canady v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 23, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04738Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Tonya Canady, on behalf of herself and others No. CV-19-04738-PHX-DWL similarly situated, 10 ORDER Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 In this putative class action, Plaintiff Tonya Canady (“Canady”) alleges that 15 Defendant Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation (“Bridgecrest”) violated the Telephone 16 Communications Protection Act,

47 U.S.C. § 227

et seq. (“TCPA”), by repeatedly calling 17 her via an automated dialing service and by continuing to make such calls after she 18…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pokorny v. Quixtar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ouadani v. TF Final Mile LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. Juan Mendez, Jr., etc. v. Hampton Court Nursing Center, LLC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API