VANAUKEN v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We previously remanded this postcon-viction proceeding after the State conceded error in connection with the summary denial of several claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. After remand, the trial court once again summarily denied Appellant’s claims. We reverse in part.
In denying claim four, the trial court stated that: (1) the jury could have arrived at the same conclusion without this evidence, and (2) there was no evidence that the jury had considered the alleged improper evidence when rendering its verdict. Neither conclusion addresses the issue of whether the evidence was properly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Solorzano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Cardenas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.