Legal Opinion
360 Construction Co. v. Atsalis Bros. Painting Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 12, 2012No. 11-12344PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Defendants Atsalis Brothers Painting Company (Atsalis Brothers Painting), Garry Manous, and Nick Atsalakis (collectively, the moving defendants) seek a protective order to prevent codefendant Andrew Richner and Richner’s law firm, Clark Hill, PLC, from producing certain documents to the plaintiff in response to a discovery subpoena. The moving defendants contend that the documents are protected by either the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work product doctrine. However, as explained below, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Reed v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Fort James Corporation v. Solo Cup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. et al. v. AS Medical Group, PLC et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Domski v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Valente v. Monarch Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023