Doyle v. Hill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DanTzeER, J., Oconee, Fall Term-, 1905. Action by W. R. Doyle against J. B. Hill. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Mr. Cary cites: Parol evidence is admissible to vary a written instrument in cflse of fraud: 71 S. C., 150. Note was without consideration: 68 S'. C., 110; 13 S. C., 332-; 19 Ency., 63n; 102 Am. St. R., 440; 83 Am1. St. R., 848; 19 Ency., 789, 797; 44 S. C., 544. cites: Parol evidence is not admissible to vary written contract: 69 S. C., 93.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
The defendant gave his promissory note, dated July 16, 1902, to W. A. Bartonj agent for the Travelers’ Insurance Company, for $116.61, payable December 1, 1902, which on its. face was to' secure payment of premium on policy Not 127683, due July 21, 1902. Shortly after the policy was delivered to defendant he returned it to the insurance company, stating his objection by letter, which gave rise to- considerable correspondence, in which- the company endeavored to meet his objections, insisting on his retaining the policy and declining…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Elliott v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Groesbeck v. MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Mason v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. MILLERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- McMillan & Son v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Evans v. Century Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Slawson v. Equitable Fire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Cockfield v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.