Legal Opinion

Applegate v. Winebrenner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 23, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. This is an action for the abatement of a nuisance, and to enjoin defendant from further keeping and maintaining the same. A temporary writ was issued on the order of the judge of the district court. Defendant filed a motion to vacate the order for a temporary injunction, which was overruled, and he appeals from this order.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

It is alleged in the petition that defendant carried on the business of selling intoxicating liquors, contrary to law, in a building and place occupied by him in Marshall-town, and that he had, at various times before the bringing of the suit, sold intoxicating liquors to plaintiff’s husband at said building, thereby causing him to become intoxicated, and that in consequence of such intoxication plaintiff was .injured in her means of support. It was proven, on the hearing of the motion to vacate the temporary injunction, that plaintiff was a citizen of Tama county. In our opinion, the ipotion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Littleton v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Hartley v. HenrettaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Conley v. ZerberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. In re Estate of WonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API