Legal Opinion

People v. Di Fabio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law and defendant’s motion denied. Memorandum: It was error for the court to suppress statements made by the defendant after 8:30 p.m. on the ground that the police unnecessarily delayed his arraignment in order to obtain a confession. We find, rather, that there was no unreasonable delay in arraignment, that defendant’s statements were made voluntarily, that none of his rights were violated and that all of his statements are, therefore, admissible.

The hearing court found and we agree that defendant was not in custody when he was interrogated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Rabinovitch v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SobchikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. MastinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. OrtliebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. KhouriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API