Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Mauldin
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided December 5, 1994No. 1:94-cr-00098PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
FURGESON, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendations filed by United States Magistrate Louis Guirola on October 24,1994, regarding Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in the above-captioned cause. The findings are that Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Co. is under no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Jim A. Mauldin for his intentional acts of alleged sexual molestation of a child. The recommendation is that, since Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is well-taken, its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen A. Greenberg, D/B/A Allen Greenberg & Associates v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Duncanville Diagnostic Center, Inc. v. Atlantic Lloyd's Insurance Co. of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1994
- Commercial Union Insurance Company v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. D.I.C., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1984
- Meridian Oil Production, Inc. v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- J.E.M. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- Canutillo Independent School District v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1995
- HUDNALL v. STATE OF TEXASDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022