Legal Opinion

Sapp v. MIAMI-DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 20, 2012No. 1D11-3697PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

REVERSED and REMANDED for the Judge of Compensation Claims to determine, solely on the basis of the record without further receipt of evidence or argument, whether the Employer/Carrier had good cause for the lack of specificity of its initial response to Claimant’s fee motion, or for the untimeliness of its amended response to Claimant’s fee motion, and for a ruling on fees given that finding as to good cause. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Q-6.124(3)(b); Morrison Mgmt. Specialists/Xchanging Integrated Servs. Group, Inc. v. Pierre, 77 So.3d 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (remanding for determination of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrison Management Specialists v. PierreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Lias v. Anderson & Shah Roofing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sapp v. Miami-Dade Police DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. LEVESQUE v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Nelson v. PharmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API