Maioriello v. Arlotta
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,
Plaintiff and defendant are adjoining property OAvners. 902 South 8th Street, Philadelphia, is OAvned by plaintiff, Avhile the adjoining premises, 900 South 8th Street, are OAvned by defendant. Defendant’s premises are L-shaped, Avith the rear lot or yard abutting plaintiff’s premises. The west brick wall of plaintiff’s kitchen is built on the rear property line. The Avail has windows overlooking defendant’s lot. Plaintiff’s building, occupying the entire lot, consists of two rooms on the first floor. The front room is used as a barber shop. The rear…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohen Et Ux. v. Perrino Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hazlett v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Rennyson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Haverstick v. SipeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Beckershoff Et Ux. v. BombaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Youst v. Keck's Food Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Exxon Corp. v. SchutzmaierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Possessky v. DiemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Wampler v. ShenkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Koresko v. FarleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.