United States v. Foster
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
O’HAIR, Senior Judge:
Among other offenses, appellant was charged with committing forcible sodomy *1265with a female airman, Airman (Amn) KLT, in a dormitory room. Prior to argument and instructions on findings, the military judge was persuaded by the trial counsel that the court members should be instructed that indecent assault was a lesser offense of sodomy. The court members were instructed accordingly, and they found appellant not guilty of sodomy, but guilty of indecent assault. Appellant now argues that the offense of indecent assault cannot be a lesser included offense…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. DugganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. McKinleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. ThackerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. WeymouthU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994