Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentMehaffy, J.
The only question in this case is whether the ballot title is sufficient. The majority hold that it is insufficient, and I do not agree in this conclusion.
In order to determine whether a ballot title is sufficient or not, it is important to inquire into the purpose of the ballot title. The majority opinion states: “Perhaps no set rule or formula can be announced as to what a valid title should contain, but it may be safely stated that if it shall identify the proposed act and fairly allege the general purposes thereof, it is sufficient.”
I think even under this rule announced by the majority…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coleman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Reeves v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Mayor of Baltimore v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Wagoner v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. LangworthyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.