Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 15, 1936No. 4-4551Published

1DissentMehaffy, J.

The only question in this case is whether the ballot title is sufficient. The majority hold that it is insufficient, and I do not agree in this conclusion.

In order to determine whether a ballot title is sufficient or not, it is important to inquire into the purpose of the ballot title. The majority opinion states: “Perhaps no set rule or formula can be announced as to what a valid title should contain, but it may be safely stated that if it shall identify the proposed act and fairly allege the general purposes thereof, it is sufficient.”

I think even under this rule announced by the majority…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Reeves v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Wagoner v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. LangworthyOregon Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API