Legal Opinion
Kidd v. Burlew
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1969No. 18575PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PECK, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs-appellees sought a declaration of rights and other specific relief under an oil and gas lease in the District Court. The controversy arose out of the different interpretation and effect given an amendment to the initial lease by the parties.
The original lessees, Bee-Kay Company (a partnership composed of Barron Kidd and Barron Ulmer Kidd), and the lessors, (James and Maude Fox), entered into an oil and gas lease covering over 450 acres in February 1963. The lease provided in part that one well must be drilled within six months of the lease and another within…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flame Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Kidd v. HoggettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Ashland Dry Goods Co. v. WagesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RitchelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kidd v. BurlewCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969