Kohler v. JA JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The numerous exceptions and assignments of error brought forward and argued by defendant present for resolution the following principal issues: (1) What was the intent of the parties in the 6 October 1964 agreement? (2) Was there sufficient competent evidence to support the submission of the issues to the jury and to support the verdict rendered? (3) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in the charge to the jury?
I
The parties do not dispute the fact that they entered into an agreement on 6 October 1964 but rather their disagreement centers around the scope of such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Sell Ex Rel. Bason v. HotchkissSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olive v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Lowe's of Shelby, Inc. v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976