Legal Opinion

In re the Mortgage Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

Motion to compel respondent to pay surplus and for inspection. Respondent opposes the application upon the ground that it was not necessary to be brought because respondent has at all times been willing to make its records available for inspection.

However, in view of the decision in Matter of Mortgage Corporation v. Menan Realty Co. (258 App. Div. 429; affd., 282 N. Y. 724), to the effect that the court may not direct the payment of a surplus except for the six months’ period preceding the application, the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought. While the decisions seem to indicate that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mortgage Corp. v. Menan Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Matter of Mortgage Corporation v. Menan Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MorrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Calm Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API