Legal Opinion

Pochna v. Pochna

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.

Defendant, appearing specially, moves for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to subdivisions 1 and 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice which authorize motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction of the subject of the action and for plaintiff’s lack of legal capacity to sue. In addition, defendant moves to vacate an order appointing a receiver in sequestration of defendant’s property in this State, pursuant to section 1171-a of the Civil Practice Act, and to vacate an order directing service of the summons and complaint by publication.

The action is brought by defendant’s wife…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lobell v. McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Benson v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Barber v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Faldi v. FaldiNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API